Household debt to hit £10,000: Borrowers more exposed to hike in interest rates

first_img Express KCS whatsapp British borrowers are more vulnerable to an interest rate rise than ever before after new figures showed unsecured household borrowings hit an all-time high last year. Unsecured debt rose nine per cent in 2014 to a record £239bn in cash terms, or £9,000 per household, driven by an increase in student loans and credit card borrowing, according to the figures compiled by PwC. The rate of growth is the fastest in a decade, and represents an additional £19.6bn borrowed last year. However, with borrowing set to reach £10,000 per household by 2016, Brits are even more exposed to a hike in the Bank of England’s base rate, currently at a record 0.5 per cent low. A two percentage point hike in the base rate would add £1,000 to each household’s interest payments on total debt every year, according to the professional services group. It also warned borrowers had become “conditioned” to low rates since the central bank lowered them six years ago. “Despite our survey revealing a relatively high degree of confidence among consumers about their ability to stay on top of their debts, affordability of the UK’s household debt pile may come under pressure in the coming years,” PwC’s financial services practice director Simon Westcott said.“As the total household debt to income ratio heads towards 172 per cent – exceeding its previous peak in the run up to the financial crisis – and interest rates increase, consumers could begin to feel squeezed once again. This could undermine growth for lenders and feed through to resurgence in bad debt.” Nearly half of last year’s additional debt came from student borrowing, which weighed in at £9.1bn. Credit card borrowings rose by £4.2bn while personal loans and overdrafts accounted for an extra £6.4bn of debt. Show Comments ▼ whatsapp Read This Next’A Quiet Place Part II’ Sets Pandemic Record in Debut WeekendFamily ProofHiking Gadgets: Amazon Deals Perfect For Your Next AdventureFamily ProofIndian Spiced Vegetable Nuggets: Recipes Worth CookingFamily ProofAmazon roars for MGM’s lion, paying $8.45 billion for studio behind JamesFamily ProofBest Wine Gifts & Wine Accessories at Every PriceGayotCheese Crostini: Delicious Recipes Worth CookingFamily ProofHomemade Tomato Soup: Delicious Recipes Worth CookingFamily ProofChicken Bao: Delicious Recipes Worth CookingFamily ProofBaked Sesame Salmon: Recipes Worth CookingFamily Proofcenter_img Monday 23 March 2015 12:30 am Share Household debt to hit £10,000: Borrowers more exposed to hike in interest rates Tags: NULL Ad Unmute by Taboolaby TaboolaSponsored LinksSponsored LinksPromoted LinksPromoted LinksYou May LikeMoneyPailShe Was A Star, Now She Works In ScottsdaleMoneyPailUndoMaternity WeekA Letter From The Devil Written By A Possessed Nun In 1676 Has Been TranslatedMaternity WeekUndozenherald.com20 Rules Genghis Khan’s Army Had To Live Byzenherald.comUndoNoteableyKirstie Alley Is So Skinny Now And Looks Like A BarbieNoteableyUndoMagellan TimesThis Is Why The Roy Rogers Museum Has Been Closed For GoodMagellan TimesUndoHigh TallyThe US Built A New Submarine The World Is Afraid OfHigh TallyUndoWorldemandCanal Drained For First Time And They Find ThisWorldemandUndoComedyAbandoned Submarines Floating Around the WorldComedyUndoMoneyWise.com15 States Where Americans Don’t Want To Live AnymoreMoneyWise.comUndolast_img read more

What to look for when picking where to give birth? Not what you may think

first_img“Pay attention to the journey from where they check in, to the triage area, to the labor room,” he said. “Look at how the labor floor is laid out. Does it feel organized or is it cluttered? Where do the doctors and nurses work when they’re not in the room? Are these workstations close by or are there some rooms that look far away?”“I would not advocate excluding a hospital simply because of the way it looks, but I think paying attention to the design may provoke questions that help you understand what your experience may be like.”Hospital administrators, Shah said, often overlook these factors too.“It is critical for health care administrators to involve clinicians in the design process to make sure the built environment supports rather than hinders their work,” he said. “It is surprisingly common for health care facilities to be designed with minimal input from the end-users.” When expectant parents tour prospective hospitals and birthing centers, they may be focusing on the wrong things: a comfortable sitting room for family or special perks.But the design of those facilities, often overlooked by prospective parents, could be what really affects the birth experience, and even increase a woman’s likelihood of having a caesarean section, according to recently published research.When gauging hospitals and birthing centers, many prospective parents dwell excessively on amenities in the delivery rooms, said the report’s author, Dr. Neel Shah, an OB/GYN at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. But there are “multiple ways that what is happening outside your room can end up impacting the care you receive.”advertisement C-section stats seem not to matter to women when choosing where to give birth By Bob Tedeschi April 11, 2017 Reprints Philippe Huguen/AFP/Getty Images Among them: Please enter a valid email address. Newsletters Sign up for Morning Rounds Your daily dose of news in health and medicine.center_img Distance between labor delivery rooms. Of the 12 childbirth facilities studied, maximum distance between delivery rooms ranged from 9 feet to 242 feet. Those with the shortest distance between rooms were among those with the lowest C-section rates. Why? In part because, even though more privacy might be nice for patients, more distance increases the staff’s travel time.Number of deliveries per room. If a facility has a relatively small number of rooms but a high number of deliveries, staff may need to move mothers through more quickly, thereby possibly increasing the likelihood of a C-section. Birth centers often seek to maintain a threshold of around 100 deliveries per room per year. At one looked at as part of the study it was 479.Distance between the nursing station and patient rooms. Such stations often host monitoring equipment for fetal heart rates and a mother’s vital signs, and stretching the distance between the station and patient rooms could burden the medical staff and ultimately increase C-section rates. (Average distances in the facilities studied varied widely, from 23 feet to 114 feet.) Leave this field empty if you’re human: Expectant parents should widen their focus when they tour, said Shah, who works in Ariadne Labs, the research group led by Dr. Atul Gawande.advertisement HealthWhat to look for when picking where to give birth? Not what you may think Privacy Policy Related: Tags hospitalswomen’s healthlast_img read more

Their baby died during his nap. Then medical bureaucrats deepened the parents’ anguish

first_img By Eric Boodman March 27, 2019 Reprints Comparing the Covid-19 vaccines developed by Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson Special ReportTheir baby died during his nap. Then medical bureaucrats deepened the parents’ anguish MEDFORD, Mass. — The parents were allowed to hold their baby until the medical examiner’s van arrived. Then, they’d have to hand his body over. So Holly and Eric High did what they could to say goodbye. They huddled in an alcove of the emergency room, cradling James in their arms, kissing him, rubbing his hair. They wished the police officer would stop questioning them. They knew she was trying to be gentle. But now, in these last moments with their son, it couldn’t help feeling like an interrogation.There had been no warning. As usual, James had woken before dawn on Sept. 29, 2015. He didn’t cry when he stirred; instead, he made this babbling sound, almost bird-like, more curious than upset. Holly scooped him from his bassinet to breastfeed. Four days earlier, his pediatrician had declared him “perfectly healthy,” and in the gathering light, he looked it, wide-eyed and fat-cheeked at 4 months old.Summer was slipping into fall, the Highs settling into a new routine. That week, Ellie, their 2-year-old, had started ballet. The month before, James had joined her at a home day care run by a neighbor, who’d quickly become their kids’ honorary third grandmother, soothing them through milestones, nudging Ellie from bottle to sippy cup. “She taught us how to be parents,” Eric often said.advertisement Related: Newsletters Sign up for Daily Recap A roundup of STAT’s top stories of the day. Helping those lost in the darkness of grief find themselves again Mancuso added that Riccobene called her, irate, demanding to know who suggested she go public. Six current or former employees confirmed they’ve heard Riccobene speak this way over the phone. They all described being horrified at how office representatives treat families and others. Fearing retaliation, they asked not to be identified.“The office does not believe it is appropriate to comment on private conversations between staff members and grieving families,” Browne said, adding that corrective action is taken if an employee is found to be unprofessional. When reached by phone, Riccobene said, “Do you believe everything these families tell you?” She asked if she could call back. Browne then emailed to say she had no further comment.Medical examiners inspire anger elsewhere, too: Being the face of the state at a parent’s worst moment is, to put it mildly, delicate work. But like diagnoses, attitudes change from person to person, office to office. At a recent SIDS conference, Dr. Mary Ann Sens, who oversees postmortem exams for around 30 counties in North Dakota and Minnesota, explained her method to a group of researchers. She likes to speak to the parents three times, she said, once before and twice after the autopsy. She wants to know what the child was like, how the parents’ religious beliefs influence their understanding of death. She explains how risk factors are different from causes, answers their questions.“It just breaks my heart, sometimes they ask, ‘Will you keep the lights on? They’re afraid of the dark,’” she said. “And I tell them I’ll keep the lights on in the morgue.”A photo of Ellie, Holly, Eric, and James in the entryway of the Highs’ home. James is about 3 1/2 months old in the photo, taken on a merry-go-round at a Pennsylvania amusement park. Holly didn’t know whether she could get pregnant again. Her grief for James was so physical, she wondered if her body had been primed for loss. A miscarriage, in January 2016, came with a grim sense of confirmation.So she wasn’t sure whether to believe it when, one month after that, she slipped out of work at lunch hour to buy a pregnancy test, and it was positive again. The excitement she shared with Eric wasn’t what it had been for Ellie and James. They didn’t buy any baby stuff, didn’t bat around names. They knew how much could go wrong; every milestone was tinged with the terror of waiting. “I remember thinking … ‘I’m just going to lose all my babies,’” she said.That was why, when Goldstein wrote to say he’d heard from the medical examiner and she was free for a meeting on July 14, 2016, Holly decided not to go. “I didn’t want to put my pregnant self into that situation,” she said. “Anything that implied that I did something, missed something with James — I just couldn’t.”Eric figured he’d be overwhelmed, though, and wanted witnesses he could trust. So he asked their kids’ pediatrician, as well as his older brother Heath, an intensive care physician in North Carolina. “The medical examiner … had become this faceless monster,” Eric explained.That morning, his fingers couldn’t keep still, tapping and twisting and fiddling as he and Heath drove downtown. Even the waiting room was behind a locked door. Goldstein met them there, and led them to a conference room upstairs. “That building where his body was,” Eric said, “it was the last place I wanted to be, but I wouldn’t be anywhere else.”It was almost hard to believe when Dr. Faryl Sandler, the medical examiner in charge of James’ case, sat down at the table. Here she was, this doctor whose work had consumed every corner of their thoughts. Eric steeled himself.But before she opened her files, Sandler said she was deeply sorry for his loss. It didn’t put Eric at ease, exactly — nothing, at the moment, in that building, could put him at ease — but he’d needed to hear it, an acknowledgement from the medical examiner that James was a person with a family who deserved care. Suddenly, Sandler became a person for him, too. Holly and Eric High made a book for their daughter, Ellie, to help explain what happened to her brother James. About the Author Reprints Leave this field empty if you’re human: Add in a 1997 true-crime thriller about infanticide — “The Death of Innocents” — and it’s an easy jump to the myth that every unexplained infant death is either carelessness or abuse. “People think SIDS is no longer a problem … but it hasn’t gone away,” said Dr. Rachel Moon, who chairs an American Academy of Pediatrics task force on safe sleep.The decline was real at first — a triumph attributed largely to “Back to Sleep,” but also to upticks in breastfeeding and prenatal care alongside decreases in teen pregnancy and maternal smoking. Then, toward 2000, the downward slope of SIDS began to coincide with increases in other, similar causes of death. What looked like fewer babies dying, the evidence suggested, was now a trend of tragedies being given other names.The boundaries are still blurred, two decades later. It’s partially a problem of definitions. Doctors coined the term SIDS in 1969, hoping to reduce stigma, but, as Goldstein explained, “it’s sort of an anti-category” — a clustering of infant deaths for which no explanation can be found. That leaves a lot of gray. And the United States is a patchwork of postmortem practices. What Dr. Sally Aiken, medical examiner of Spokane County, Wash., calls “sudden unexpected death in infancy,” her counterpart elsewhere might designate “cause unknown” or “accidental suffocation and strangulation in bed.” Because such ways of dying seldom leave distinctive markings on a body, much depends on observations at the scene. Aiken knows that across some state or county lines, risk factors get listed as causes. “It certainly does skew statistics,” she said. A look at how sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) numbers have changed since 1990. Lumped together, these categories form one of the leading causes of infant mortality in the U.S., after complications of birth and congenital defects: There were 3,600 cases in 2017.To Carrie Shapiro-Mendoza, an epidemiologist at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there’s a pressing need to standardize the way these deaths are investigated and classified. The current system “leads to unreliable statistics … and impedes prevention efforts,” she said.The experts all agree: Babies should sleep on their backs, alone, with no soft bedding. That isn’t a cure-all, though. “The predominant messages are, ‘This problem’s solved, you put your baby on their back and nobody dies from SIDS,’” Goldstein said. “But look at James High. No risk factors.”Even when there are risk factors in a baby’s sleep environment, Goldstein pointed out, there’s usually more to the story. Yet research that might yield a fuller explanation is often dismissed. In 2008, the National Institutes of Health provided $29 million for the study of unexpected infant deaths. By 2017, the figure had withered to $13 million. When discussing his own work on the subject, Goldstein said, he’s heard hospital higher-ups respond, “Oh, I thought that was just people smothering their kids.”Such thinking has a profound effect on parents. It’s sickening enough to know your baby died and science may have no explanation. It’s worse to wait months — or years — for an autopsy report, worrying the death is somehow your fault. It’s worse, still, to hear from the Massachusetts medical examiner’s office that your infant is “not a priority” and that you should not call again.Holly and Eric at home in Salem, Mass. Holly holds James’ swaddling blanket, which they keep in a chest of his belongings. The police had to drive them home. Once there, though, the Highs couldn’t face a house all set up for James. They began to walk, their minds a blur, ending up at the day care. The police were gone now, bedding and bottles taken as evidence. They cried with the owner, told her it wasn’t her fault.There was no one to do that for them. The next morning, investigators from two child welfare agencies showed up, unannounced. The next week, the Highs got a bill for James’ trip to the emergency room: $1,365 for the attempted resuscitation, $2.87 for the bag of dextrose and water to keep him hydrated and fed. The hospital’s financial department called, asking if they intended to pay.The medical examiner’s office was supposed to refer parents like the Highs to the Massachusetts Center for Unexpected Infant and Child Death, for free grief support. Parents’ isolation can be intense, explained Shari King, who directs that program. Friends become afraid to say the baby’s name. Some parents, consumed with loss, see their child’s face in the features of strangers. “People need to know they aren’t crazy,” King said.But the Highs heard nothing. Holly ached everywhere; all she wanted to do was sleep, clutching a piece of James’ clothing like a talisman. Her mother tried to coax her to eat. Everything was a reminder of his absence. She and Eric saw babies everywhere. They discarded the clothes they’d been wearing that day.Holly had loved nursing James, the intimacy of it. Now, she and Eric sat together crying as she pumped, only to throw her milk away. “I was really mad at my body for not knowing to stop,” she said.They had a memorial service to arrange, but knew nothing about what was happening with James’ physical remains. “They didn’t even tell us that his body was ready to be picked up by a funeral home,” remembered Eric. So, after mustering courage for a few days, he called the medical examiner’s office. The conversation made him hope he never had to phone again: “It was very gruff and matter-of-fact, like, ‘His body is waiting.’”Holly and Eric had many more questions — all pressing, all seemingly unanswerable. Some they dealt with as best they could. To help explain what death is to their 2-year-old, they adapted a classic book on losing a sibling — “Where’s Jess?” — and read it to Ellie. She was the reason they kept getting up in the morning. When she woke in the middle of the night, wanting to talk to James, they closed their eyes and sat with her as she told her brother about her day.Other questions lingered. While Holly was pregnant with Ellie, a bright patch had appeared in her 20-week scan: a growth on the baby’s lung. “The best you can hope for is that she outgrows it,” they remembered the surgeon saying. “But if it outgrows her, then you’re not going to have a baby.” Even once she was born healthy, they were on tenterhooks, knowing she would need surgery in a year. When the procedure finally arrived, Eric forbade his mother from snapping pictures: No matter how adorable Ellie was in her hospital gown, this was a day they wanted to forget. Now, they couldn’t stop wondering if James’ death was somehow related.On that day, the state trooper had mentioned that the toxicology report would take around six weeks. But the date came and went. They heard nothing. Was there something they’d missed? Their worries filled the medical examiner’s silence. “Are we not hearing back from the ME’s office because there is something about his case that is making them …” Eric paused, as if he couldn’t even contemplate the thought. “Is there something suspicious we don’t know?”Often, everyday interactions didn’t help. After the Highs’ neighbor decided to retire, they told the director of a new day care that they had a son who died as an infant; she responded: “What was in the crib?” They tried to give away their baby equipment, Eric said, “but nobody would take it.”“Even the car seat,” added Holly. “Nobody wanted that.”“They feel like your kid is tainted. Or cursed.”“They feel like the same thing is going to happen to their kid.”A photo of James at 4 months old and the urn containing his ashes (left) on the Highs’ bureau. It was the accusation that struck Goldstein when he first witnessed the aftermath of SIDS. He was about 22, still years away from being a physician. His interest in the body had arisen only because his own was under attack. As a philosophy and ethnomusicology student at Wesleyan University, he’d spent a few months in south India, learning a lute-like instrument called the veena and unknowingly cultivating within his gut a wriggling mass of parasites.Standing in the throng outside a government clinic with a cup of his own diarrhea changed him. He saw just how much politics could scar the body. “Most of us were in line for something you could treat — or prevent with just good water — and they were all wrecked,” he said.To get a taste for medicine, he volunteered at an emergency room in his hometown of Vineland, N.J. “One morning, they brought in … I didn’t know what they brought in; it’s so unusual for an ambulance to pull up with no sirens and no lights,” he said. It was a bundle about the size of a shoebox, a tiny wrapped thing in the middle of a stretcher. The parents followed after, shadowed by a policeman. They looked utterly crushed, but the officer didn’t have the solicitous air of someone providing support; instead, he loomed, hand by his holster, walkie-talkie crackling. When the doctor unwrapped the child, a fly that had been trapped in the blankets buzzed out and up toward the mother’s face. She started to swat it, but then stopped, her hand in midair, as if, Goldstein said, she were suddenly afraid.Over three decades later — after Harvard Medical School, after work in pediatric palliative care — those scenes in India and New Jersey continue to shape Goldstein’s work. He still has something of the philosophy student about him, a kind of contrarian twinkle. But rather than Marx and Hegel, his arguments now focus on how the bureaucratic and the biological intersect. He’s so obsessed, he needs a reminder, taped to the corner of his computer: “Food for thought is no substitute for the real thing.”To him, giving parents as rigorous answers as possible about their infant’s death is the best avenue to healthy grief. So, in 2012, he co-founded Robert’s Program at Boston Children’s. It offers both bereavement support and inclusion in research studies, for free. (Goldstein turns down cases in which there’s any suspicion of abuse, and refuses requests to be a paid expert witness.)His team sifts through neurons and genomes, looking for patterns that might help explain these deaths, publishing findings in statistic-studded papers, but also giving parents a personalized report about their child — providing them the kind of science that cash-strapped state labs often can’t.Dr. Richard Goldstein in his office at Boston Children’s Hospital. The Highs found Goldstein the way they found most support services: Holly searching online late at night, sending emails, one person leading to the next — a grief-stricken scavenger hunt. Among these hints and clues, Robert’s Program represented something new: Someone besides the medical examiner who might explain what happened.By their intake appointment in January 2016, three and a half months after James’ death, they still weren’t leaving the house for anything besides absolute necessities. They drove in silence, readying themselves to relive the trauma of that day. Goldstein led them into a small exam room.His focus, he explained, was the oft-neglected contribution of underlying biological abnormalities: metabolic disorders, cardiac disruptions, brain malformations that might rob infants of certain lifesaving reflexes if the baby’s airway were obstructed. That’s what his team would be looking for.But the program also offered another boon: the relationship Goldstein spent years forging with the Massachusetts medical examiner’s office. The agency provided tissue samples for Goldstein’s research. His program deepened the official search for a cause of death. They jointly explained their findings to the family in person at the end.That was part of the allure for the Highs. They signed consent forms, sketched family trees, gave blood. They answered Goldstein’s questions in the hope that it would help him answer their own: Should they worry about Ellie? Would having another baby mean this would happen again? They needed some kind of an explanation, and had heard nothing from the fortress-like agency that had taken their kid.Ellie’s drawing of her family hangs above her and Warren’s bunk bed. From left, Mom, James, Penny (the dog), Warren, Dad, and Ellie. Wedged between hospitals and highways, the Massachusetts Office of the Chief Medical Examiner is a squat construction of redbrick and gray, its concrete crumbling at the corners. Outside, ambulance drivers take cigarette breaks as traffic whispers on and off I-93.Inside, the place has been troubled for years: short-staffed, underfunded, backlogged, overwhelmed by the bodies of the opioid crisis. When the last chief retired, the agency was not meeting the national target of finishing 90 percent of autopsy reports within 90 days of examining the cadaver.Then, in October 2017, Dr. Mindy Hull took over the job. By August 2018, she’d met that goal — but not for infants, whose cases tend to be more complex. Sixteen of the 56 baby investigations from 2017 and 23 of the 57 from 2018 were still pending this month, said spokesman Felix Browne.What bereaved parents noticed about Hull’s tenure, besides the wait, was the slashing of support services. When the two licensed social workers employed as family liaisons left, Hull didn’t replace them. Instead, in a January 2018 email to employees, chief of staff Lisa Riccobene said she would handle any “family that is difficult to reason with” — a duty she kept after the Boston Globe revealed, months later, that she’d falsely claimed to have a psychology degree.Hull’s staff stopped meeting with Robert’s Program families and Goldstein. Her office also stopped automatically making referrals to the Center for Unexpected Infant and Child Death; the center’s grief counseling caseload plummeted from 30 or 35 families a year to under 20.Cutting off these referrals, Goldstein worries, will exacerbate a problem that’s already apparent. Sudden unexpected infant deaths are significantly more common in poor, Native American, and black families, but those groups are less likely to get support services.The office does not consider such programs essential, Browne said, and needs fewer liaisons because wait times have decreased overall (though the agency’s pace is now behind the national standard again, the Globe reported this month). The agency, he added, is hiring more doctors and “remains focused on its mission to deliver timely information to citizens of the Commonwealth.”Parents like the Highs didn’t stop needing support, though. All five Massachusetts families interviewed for this article described being stuck in limbo during the 10 months or more they spent waiting for news from the medical examiner. One mother said she was told to stop calling; another was told the documents would come whenever they were ready. Meanwhile, these parents were terrified their other children would stop breathing, too. Again and again, they’d touch their kids’ chests at night, to double-check.“It’s infuriating,” said Rebecca Smerling of Lexington, who is still waiting, 13 months after the death of her 5-week-old, Drew.Jodi Bissonnette of Dedham, who lost 2-month-old Thomas in 2018, spent a year worrying the culprit was some contaminant in her breast milk or her house. “I don’t want someone touching my son and not giving me answers,” she said. “It tears you apart, every night, every day, every hour: ‘What could I have done differently?’”After losing 28-day-old Ambrose in 2016, Maggie Moran Mancuso of Dorchester said she spent nearly three years calling the medical examiner’s office and being told, “Your baby’s not a priority.” Finally, this past January, a kindly employee suggested she might have more success getting an autopsy report if she put political pressure on the office. She wrote to her state representative; within a few days, Ambrose’s case was closed. “It’s almost like you’re in purgatory,” said Mancuso, who founded a support group called Ambrose’s Angels. “The amount of pain they add to each family — they have no clue … how much more torture it was than it had to be.” Photos by Alissa Ambrose Motion graphics by Hyacinth Empinado Privacy Policy Trending Now: James was no longer James by the time they got to the hospital. He was tiny in the middle of a full-sized bed. The team had been working on him for a while — jolting him with epinephrine, coaxing his lungs to breathe — and had gotten no response, they told Eric when he arrived. They wanted to know when they should stop.“I need you to keep working on him until my wife gets here,” he remembered saying. He held James’ hand while the doctors tried to bring him back to life.Holly collapsed as soon as she walked in. “I just want to hold him,” she said again and again.He was declared dead at 2:34 p.m. Someone remembered the mementoes that hospitals collect for the family when a baby is stillborn. They pressed the soles of James’ feet into ink and made prints, right and left, slid them into a frame frilled with white lace. They cut a lock of his hair.Then, they swaddled him, pulled on a newborn’s hat, and handed him back to his parents to hold under the supervision of a Medford detective. A state trooper stood nearby. The Highs, both then 30, were grateful the police had called their family members and arranged for Ellie to go to a friend’s house. Now they wanted the officers to go away. They answered questions in a daze. No, they had no concerns about the day care provider. James had been a bit fussier than usual, but it was just a growth spurt. He’d been drinking mostly breast milk with a small supplement of formula — Similac, the blue can. No, he’d had no fevers. Yes, he always slept on his back.When the time came, Eric refused to pass James to a stranger. He was allowed to carry the body to the edge of the premises himself, down a long hallway toward the loading dock. The medical examiner’s employee was waiting.“She was like, ‘We’ll take good care of him, don’t worry,’” Eric remembered. “Then I handed him to her because I had to.”He walked back to Holly, and recalls being told, “OK, you guys can go home.” Eric laughs quietly at the memory of it. In retrospect, the wording probably wasn’t that callous, but that’s how it felt right then: Once Eric and Holly had answered questions and given up their infant, officials had no use for them. The Highs were left wondering whether they’d somehow done something wrong.“I don’t think I can drive,” Eric replied.Holly holds prints of James’ feet and a lock of his hair. It’s hard to imagine anything that could deepen the grief of losing a child. Parents who’ve experienced it echo King David: You wish you could have died instead. The tiniest actions — controlling a car, even climbing out of bed — seem insurmountable. You fill out forms, make funeral arrangements through a fog.When an infant unexpectedly stops breathing during sleep, the usual bureaucracy of death is multiplied, the paperwork thickened with accusation. Investigations are triggered with the local police, the state police, the agency that checks for child abuse. In some jurisdictions, officials appear soon afterward, asking parents to re-enact what happened, a doll standing in for their baby. The medical examiner or coroner takes the body, to determine a cause of death, looking for hints of “foul play.”These protocols are designed to protect. Often they do. But how an officer or medical examiner carries them out can sharpen the suspicion inherent in any investigation, heightening parents’ self-blame even when there’s no evidence of wrongdoing. As director of a Boston Children’s Hospital program that studies unexpected child deaths, Dr. Richard Goldstein hears such stories all the time. An officer tells parents their house is a crime scene; a state employee says no, you can’t hold your baby, we’re putting him into a body bag.Goldstein knows such lapses in compassion are partially born of confusion. It’s lurked on death certificates for ages, but took a new, more visible turn in the 1980s, with growing evidence that “cot deaths” were rarer when infants slept on their backs. The news traveled through Australian studies and European advisories, eventually bursting out of American radios and TVs in 1994, with a public health campaign called “Back to Sleep.”The rate of “sudden infant death syndrome” plummeted — and kindled that old nemesis of statisticians everywhere, the conflation of risk factor and cause. Americans mistakenly thought that belly sleeping, which can increase a baby’s likelihood of dying, was the clear-cut reason someone’s infant died. They dropped the kids off with her around 8 a.m., Ellie running in to play with her friends. James’ eyes crinkled closed when he smiled.For years afterward, their bodies would remember the time of day when it happened: Whenever Holly was sitting at her desk and felt a blinding rise in panic, she knew it was around 1:30 in the afternoon. The police reached Eric first, calling and calling until he stepped out of the chemistry lab he was teaching at Tufts University. James was being taken to Lawrence Memorial Hospital. They wouldn’t tell Eric what was wrong.It was Holly who called the day care from her actuarial office in downtown Boston, who heard their neighbor coming apart on the phone. James never woke from his nap, she said. When she checked on him, his skin was blue.advertisement General Assignment Reporter Eric focuses on narrative features, exploring the startling ways that science and medicine affect people’s lives. @ericboodman [email protected] Then, she moved through the autopsy report. He remembered her telling him that everything in James’ sleep environment seems to have been safe, that he was a perfectly healthy, normal baby. The manner of death was “natural.”As unsatisfying as that answer was, Eric was relieved. James was a classic SIDS case. At least they had a name for what happened.Then it was Goldstein’s turn. His team had found, in James’ brain, mild malformations of the hippocampus, which they’d observed in other babies who’d died suddenly and unexpectedly. Layers of cells that should have been stitched together were pulling apart. Coils of tissue that should have looked the same in both hemispheres of the brain showed asymmetries.The most common of these anomalies — found, according to Goldstein’s research, in 41 percent of infants who’d died without explanation but only 8 percent of those with a clear cause of death — was also a classic sign of temporal lobe epilepsy. Goldstein couldn’t say whether James had died with or from the miswiring in his brain. The science wasn’t strong enough yet. He could offer only correlation, not causation, a hypothesis that James may have had a seizure.They’d also detected a genetic mutation in both Eric and James, potentially linked to electrical signals in the nervous system and —That’s when Eric lost it.He doesn’t cry easily. He’s more likely to let out a sad, disbelieving laugh. But now his eyes welled up, his voice caught in his throat. All he could think was: “It’s my fault.”Everyone in the conference room tried to reassure him. Only Holly could. Later that afternoon, as they wandered through their neighborhood by the Mystic River, she was firm: It wasn’t Eric’s fault. It wasn’t anybody’s fault. It just happened.The genetic variant proved, with more research, to be harmless, and Warren James High was born healthy on Nov. 7, 2016.The autopsy report finally arrived at the Highs’ in February 2018, more than 18 months after the meeting with the medical examiner, two and a half years after James’ death — so long that Eric had figured the summary was never coming, and had stopped rushing home before Holly so she wouldn’t have to find it in their daily scattering of mail. She opened the thick envelope and got halfway through the first paragraph before realizing that its clinical details made her feel sick.Eric hid the report in a drawer at work. “It’s not something I ever want to read,” he said. “It’s about just getting an official document that they’re done, so we can put it in a box, and know that XYZ investigations are finished.”Holly, Ellie, and Eric on an unseasonably warm December afternoon at a playground near their home in Salem. The High family walk across Salem Common on Holly and Eric’s ninth wedding anniversary in December. Warren and Eric at the playground. The hardest times are the happiest times, those moments when you feel good but also guilty for feeling good, as if even an instant of unequivocal joy without James is not allowed. Tonight is one of those times. It’s a Friday evening in December, the Highs’ new apartment in Salem filled with the everyday release once school and work are done. The kids come tearing in and they’re everywhere at once, wriggling out of their coats, hugging their dad around the legs, shrieking through every room in the house.Holly follows after them carrying a sheaf of Ellie’s artwork, a portrait of a pumpkin in thick brushstrokes visible beneath her hand. She yawns, still wearing her coat, as she picks the kids’ jackets up from the living room floor and carries them to the two hooks by the entrance, under the framed portraits of their three kids.Eric had procrastinated about putting up those hooks. The task, simple as it was, was a reminder that they only had two jackets, two schoolbags to hang up. In the same way, he and Holly hesitate when someone asks how many children they have. They don’t always want to reveal something so painful, so personal — at a work conference, or in the elevator — but James is one of their kids. Sometimes, they use Goldstein’s findings, telling people their son had a brainstem abnormality and died, so they don’t have to get The Look that comes when they talk about SIDS.Now Warren is on the kitchen floor doing his 2-year-old approximation of his big sister’s cartwheels, a kind of wiggle-somersault. Ellie is making a fort among the pillows of her parents’ bed.Each of these evenings is at once routine and unique, structured by parents, colored by the idiosyncrasies of little kids. Sometimes they go to the playground in the last of the winter light, racing each other across the frost-hardened grass. Sometimes Warren says no to every food in the fridge except cake, and his parents tell him that he can’t just eat cake. Sometimes Ellie makes slime, kneading dye in until it becomes the right hue. Sometimes, they have get-your-energy-out dance parties, Warren toddling circles around Ellie as she twirls and spins.Sometimes, once she’s all danced out, instead of asking for “Don’t Let the Pigeon Drive the Bus!”, Ellie wants to hear James’ book. So Eric pulls it from the shelf, cuddles up with her and Warren on their bunk bed, holds the pages wide, and begins to read: “I asked Mommy and Daddy, ‘Where’s James?’ They told me James is dead. I wanted to know what dead is. ‘Is dead like sleeping?’ Mommy said dead was not like sleeping.” Eric Boodman Please enter a valid email address. Tags Bostonpediatricslast_img read more

More needs to be done to prevent insider trading: OSC

first_img Corporate insiders and issuers need to do a much better job of reporting insider-trading activity and must improve their policies to prevent improper insider trading, according to a new regulatory review from the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC). The OSC published a staff notice on Thursday detailing the results of a review of insider reporting, which found “material insider reporting deficiencies” in approximately 70% of the issuers that it reviewed. The OSC examined the filings of 100 firms — 35% of which were venture issuers from a broad cross section of industries — and 1,500 individual insiders. The review discovered at least one significant deficiency in the majority of firms, involving about 200, or 15%, of the individual insiders it reviewed. FINRA bans analyst for insider trading Related news SEC alleges man sold insider trading tips on dark web James Langton ASIC ready to make deals with devils Keywords Insider tradingCompanies Ontario Securities Commission “The compliance rate for insider reporting can be substantially improved, and this improvement needs to happen across all reporting issuers,” the OSC report states. Indeed, the OSC’s review found reporting lapses at all sorts of firms it examined, noting that there was “minimal correlation between the size of the reporting issuer and the occurrence of material insider reporting deficiencies.” The deficiencies uncovered in the review typically required insiders to amend their filings and often to pay additional filing fees, as a result. The OSC report notes that failing to meet insider reporting requirements undermines the objectives of these rules, which include: deterring illegal insider trading; preventing shenanigans, such as options backdating or opportunistic option grants; and to provide the market with information on the trading activity of insiders, which may inform their own trading decisions. “When insiders fail to comply with insider reporting requirements, this affects the integrity, reliability and effectiveness of the insider reporting regime, which in turn has a negative impact on market efficiency,” the OSC says in its notice. “As such, it is crucial for investors to have access to reliable trading information of insiders.” Lack of filing was one of the biggest issues uncovered in the review, which indicates that approximately 30% of issuers had at least one reporting insider that wasn’t identified as an insider and wasn’t filing insider reports to the regulators at all. Most of these were directors, senior officers, or significant shareholders of reporting issuers, it notes. Although, in certain cases, the insiders who failed to file were the issuers themselves, the OSC’s review says. “All instances of inaccurate reporting can negatively impact the insider reporting regime. However, when an insider fails to file any report in connection with a trade in a security, our regime is significantly impacted,” the OSC’s notice says. The review also found that firms generally need to improve their insider-trading policies. It notes that most issuers have written insider-trading policies in place, but that some of these policies do not restrict derivatives-based transactions, option grants, or similar forms of stock-based compensation during blackout periods. Policies prohibiting these transactions “are essential to avoid public and regulatory scrutiny” about possible improper insider trading, the OSC’s notice says. It also recommends that issuers review their insider-trading policies annually to ensure that they align with current Canadian securities legislation. In an effort to boost compliance with these requirements, the OSC’s report sets out guidance on the various deficiencies uncovered in the review. “Reporting insiders and reporting issuers should use the findings and guidance in this review to strengthen their compliance with insider reporting obligations,” says Huston Loke, director of corporate finance with the OSC, in the notice. “Reporting issuers can play a significant role in enhancing compliance in this area by strengthening their insider trading policies.” The OSC is hosting a webinar on insider reporting obligations on Feb. 24. Share this article and your comments with peers on social media Facebook LinkedIn Twitterlast_img read more

Canada Life cuts premiums for group health insurance plans

first_img There’s $149 million in B.C.’s lost and found Paper family of four under a paper cutout insurance umbrella zimmytws/123RF Canadian Press The credits will be applied to May invoices.The reductions will be 50% for dental and 20% for vision and extended health care benefits, excluding prescription drugs.Canada Life says prescription drugs are not included as the services are essential and the number of claims have not dropped.The insurer says the premium reductions will help more than 26,000 of its business customers. Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Share this article and your comments with peers on social media Keywords Insurance,  Group insuranceCompanies Canada Life Assurance Co. Merger of B.C. financial services, real estate regulators nears completion The Canada Life Assurance Co. is cutting group health insurance premiums for its employer-sponsored group benefits plans in a bid to help small- and medium-sized businesses dealing with Covid-19.The company says that beginning in May it will apply premium reduction adjustments for the month of April, retroactive to April 1. Related news Empire Life partners with digital platform to offer employee benefits to small bizlast_img read more

Ford will offer a manual with its Bronco Sasquatch off-roader, but there’s a catch

first_img RELATED TAGSBroncoFordNon-LuxuryNew VehiclesNon-Luxury Ford Bronco team squashes V8 possibilities, but welcomes manual transmissionAnd while the Bronco is scheduled to arrive in the spring of 2021, the Sasquatch-plus-stick isn’t due until late in 2021. The Rolls-Royce Boat Tail may be the most expensive new car ever But there will be some unhappy faces nevertheless, because there’s still a limit to the manual transmission’s availability. The Bronco will come with two engines: a 2.3L EcoBoost (turbocharged) four-cylinder engine, making 270 horsepower and 310 lb-ft of torque; and a 2.7L EcoBoost V6, cranking out 310 horses and 400 lb-ft of torque. The four-cylinder comes with the seven-speed or with a ten-speed automatic, while the V6 comes only with the autobox.In its very-carefully-worded press release about the Sasquatch-plus-manual, Ford never mentioned engines. A Ford rep has since confirmed to that the manual is still restricted to the four-cylinder, even when teamed with the Sasquatch package.That’s likely going to play into Jeep’s bragging rights, where the available V6 on the Rubicon comes with a six-speed manual, in addition to an automatic (though that trim doesn’t offer the Sasquatch’s 35-inch tires).RELATED Trending Videos It seems if you ask loudly enough, you will receive. Ford is giving in to numerous requests from Bronco fans, who wanted the seriously-off-road Sasquatch package and wanted it with a manual transmission. The company has now announced the availability of both of these mashed together.That gets you the fun of rowing your own gears, plus all the off-road goodness of the Sasquatch option, which adds 17-inch beadlock-capable wheels, 35-inch Goodyear mud terrain tires, front and rear electronic locking axles, a 4.7:1 final drive ratio, wider track, position-sensitive Bilstein shocks, and wider fender flares.The seven-speed is basically a six-speed manual with a “crawler” gear. The combination of that transmission, and the available advanced 4×4 system, can provide a maximum crawl ratio of 94.75:1. Clever girl: Rumours swirl of a forthcoming Ford Bronco Raptorcenter_img COMMENTSSHARE YOUR THOUGHTS PlayThe Rolls-Royce Boat Tail may be the most expensive new car everPlay3 common new car problems (and how to prevent them) | Maintenance Advice | Driving.caPlayFinal 5 Minivan Contenders | Driving.caPlay2021 Volvo XC90 Recharge | Ministry of Interior Affairs | Driving.caPlayThe 2022 Ford F-150 Lightning is a new take on Canada’s fave truck | Driving.caPlayBuying a used Toyota Tundra? Check these 5 things first | Used Truck Advice | Driving.caPlayCanada’s most efficient trucks in 2021 | Driving.caPlay3 ways to make night driving safer and more comfortable | Advice | Driving.caPlayDriving into the Future: Sustainability and Innovation in tomorrow’s cars | virtual panelPlayThese spy shots get us an early glimpse of some future models | The Sasquatch package is standard on the Wildtrak trim level, which comes only with the V6 and so will only offer an automatic transmission. It’s also standard on the First Edition, a trim that won’t be offered in Canada. On all other trims – Base, Big Bend, Black Diamond, Outer Banks, and Badlands – you’ll be able to get the Sasquatch with manual or automatic, on two- and four-door models. See More Videos We encourage all readers to share their views on our articles using Facebook commenting Visit our FAQ page for more information.last_img read more

Statement from Karissa Kruse, President of Sonoma County Winegrowers:

first_imgFacebook TAGSfeaturedKarissa KruseSonoma County WinegrowersWildfire Linkedin Email Share Advertisement“Today, the fires continue to burn out of control, power and cell service is spotty and access around Sonoma County is still highly restricted.  With more than 90% of the winegrape harvest completed in Sonoma County, many growers in safe zones are heading out today to begin picking the remainder of their crops provided they can get their grapes to their winery destination. In fact, some Chardonnay, likely the last to be picked in Sonoma County this year, was harvested this morning in the Russian River Valley and I am pleased to report the grapes were of excellent quality and were able to get to a winery in Napa Valley.  On a positive note, given how late it is in the season, the concern of smoke taint on the grapes currently on the vine is low.  This assessment would be much different had the fires occurred in late July or early August. We have only confirmed that Paradise Ridge Winery in Santa Rosa has been destroyed.  We have been unable to obtain accurate updates from Sonoma Valley as most of that area is still under evacuation orders.  Please know that the Sonoma County wine community has been overwhelmed with the positive thoughts, prayers and support we have received from across the county and around the world.  It gives us the strength to stand strong and know our communities will survive.” Advertisement Pinterest Twitter ReddIt Home Industry News Releases Statement from Karissa Kruse, President of Sonoma County Winegrowers:Industry News ReleasesWine BusinessStatement from Karissa Kruse, President of Sonoma County Winegrowers:By Press Release – October 11, 2017 29 0 Previous articleLivermore Valley Wineries to Collect Relief Donations for Napa, Sonoma and Mendocino WinegrowersNext articleMendocino County Redwood Complex Fire Impacts on Vineyards Press Releaselast_img read more

Raise a Glass: Meet the Sommeliers at Waldorf Astoria Beverly Hills

first_imgPinterest AdvertisementBEVERLY HILLS, Calif. – (August 15, 2018) – Upon the opening of Waldorf Astoria Beverly Hills, Angelenos and visitors alike were introduced to world-class dining brought to life by French chef Jean-Georges Vongerichten via Jean-Georges Beverly Hills and The Rooftop by JG. Staffed with top-notch culinary experts in the kitchen, the hotel also boasts a team of skilled and passionate sommeliers to round-out the renowned gastronomic experience. A regular participant and successful bidder at the prestigious Premier Napa Valley auction, Waldorf Astoria Beverly Hills also celebrates the sommelier team for its part in Jean-Georges Beverly Hills’ recent receipt of Wine Spectator’s “Best Of” Award of Excellence in its first year.Wine Director Jordan Nova oversees all beverage services at Waldorf Astoria Beverly Hills. As an Advanced Sommelier through the Court of Master Sommeliers and a Certified Specialist of Wine through the Society of Wine Educators, Jordan is a young man with a drive to bring the best of the world’s wine to the lips of every guest. Jordan was recently voted one of Zagat’s “30 Under 30” innovative hospitality professionals, making him ideally suited to manage the fine wines in the cellar of this five-star hotel.Favorite Wine: “If you’ve ever sat down for a drink with me, you’ll know that my life and career is a love letter to champagne. But for the Waldorf Astoria and Jean-Georges, we focus on sharing great wines from great people. Every time you buy a bottle of wine, you yourself are a patron of an artist and a family. From living in Napa Valley, I love to spread the story of elegant, well-made wines like Azur Wines, Staglin Family, Del Dotto Vineyards, Continuum Estate and RAEN. Being in luxury, we, and our guests, are addicted to the finesse of Bordeaux. We work very closely with our friends at Duclot Vinicole to bring wine direct from the Chateaux and I personally taste every bottle to make sure they are at their best.”Jordan is joined by Sommelier Max Goldberg who is a Certified Sommelier through the Court of Master Sommeliers. His hospitality journey began at a young age as an aspiring chef in Los Angeles. During his studies at The Culinary Institute of America at Hyde Park, Max discovered a natural talent and strong affinity for the world of wine and spirits. Max graduated with a dual degree in culinary arts and beverage management, then ventured up the west coast where he worked with Gary Danko before returning home to Los Angeles.Favorite Wine: “Red Burgundy is hard not to love – specifically, I have an affection for the wines from Domaine Marquis d’Angerville from the town of Volnay. They make these intensely aromatic and floral red wines from Pinot Noir. At Jean-Georges I love showing their 2004 ‘Clos de Ducs’ vineyard and any of their 2007s that we receive direct from their cellars.  At home, I’ve collected a few 2011s and 2009s that are hard to beat.”Sommelier Michael Scribner is also a Certified Sommelier through the Court of Master Sommeliers. Michael’s love of beverage and hospitality stems from the confluence of his years in the performing arts and his Paso Robles heritage. As a native of California’s central coast wine country, Michael followed his dreams to train with Ballet West, one of the U.S.’ premier classical ballet companies. Finding that wine and spirits exhibit the same detail and passion as the arts, Michael began to venture into the world of beverage and also worked at the Grand America Hotel in Salt Lake City, a Four Star Hotel by Forbes Travel Guide.Favorite Wine: “Personally, I have an affinity for wines that are powerful yet graceful. To me, that’s the Rioja region of Spain. Lopez de Heredia is a classic producer of Rioja, with wines that dance between bold and elegant,” said Michael. “From our cellar, I am still mesmerized by the subtle strength and vivacious aromas of the 1980 Lopez de Heredia Viña Tondonia – ‘Gran Reserva.’ To try this lush and savory wine at home, check your wine shop for Lopez de Heredia’s 2005 ‘Viña Tondonia- Reserva’.”Waldorf Astoria Beverly Hills, Jean-Georges Beverly Hills and The Rooftop by JG are located at 9850 Wilshire Blvd, Beverly Hills, CA 90210. To learn more about the team and for interview opportunities, please contact [email protected]  About Waldorf Astoria Beverly Hills:Waldorf Astoria Beverly Hills is Waldorf Astoria Hotels & Resorts’ first new build on the West Coast and second California property, joining the legendary Waldorf Astoria portfolio of now 26 hotels and resorts. The hotel’s 119 deluxe rooms and 51 suites are part of a world-class, Art Deco- influenced design created by renowned interior design firm Pierre-Yves Rochon, Inc. (PYR). World-class dining can be discovered at the hotel with three venues created by the legendary French chef Jean-Georges Vongerichten: the elegant Jean-Georges Beverly Hills, the chef’s signature restaurant, as well as The Rooftop by JG and Jean-Georges Beverly Hills Bar. Helmed by a top-notch team of culinary experts hand picked by Vongerichten and including Executive Chef Steve Benjamin of L’Atelier de Joël Robuchon fame, the chefs are committed to sourcing foods locally whenever possible and a cornerstone of the menus in all the food and beverage offerings at the Waldorf Astoria Beverly Hills. The hotel also features 6,300 square feet of meeting spaces, perfect for social events, corporate meetings or gala celebrations.The property recently won the Forbes Five-Star Award, and was named best new hotel on the Travel + Leisure 2018 It List, 2018 Travel + Leisure “World’s Best” Awards, and by U.S. News and World Report. For more information, visit Waldorf Astoria Hotels & ResortsWaldorf Astoria Hotels & Resorts is a portfolio of just over 30 iconic properties that create a unique sense of place with a relentless commitment to personal service and culinary expertise in landmark locations around the world. Unified by their inspirational environments and True Waldorf Service, Waldorf Astoria hotels deliver graceful service from the moment a guest books through checkout. Waldorf Astoria is a part of Hilton, a leading global hospitality company. Experience Waldorf Astoria by booking at or through the Hilton Honors mobile app. Learn about the brand by visiting, and follow Waldorf Astoria on Twitter, Instagram and Facebook.About HiltonHilton (NYSE: HLT) is a leading global hospitality company, with a portfolio of 14 world-class brands comprising more than 5,400 properties with nearly 880,000 rooms, in 106 countries and territories. Hilton is dedicated to fulfilling its mission to be the world’s most hospitable company by delivering exceptional experiences – every hotel, every guest, every time. The company’s portfolio includes Hilton Hotels & Resorts, Waldorf Astoria Hotels & Resorts, Conrad Hotels & Resorts, Canopy by Hilton, Curio Collection by Hilton, DoubleTree by Hilton, Tapestry Collection by Hilton, Embassy Suites by Hilton, Hilton Garden Inn, Hampton by Hilton, Tru by Hilton, Homewood Suites by Hilton, Home2 Suites by Hilton and Hilton Grand Vacations. The company also manages an award-winning customer loyalty program, Hilton Honors. Hilton Honors members who book directly through preferred Hilton channels have access to instant benefits, including a flexible payment slider that allows members to choose exactly how many Points to combine with money, an exclusive member discount that can’t be found anywhere else, and free standard Wi-Fi. Visit for more information, and connect with Hilton on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram and YouTube. Advertisement Email Linkedin ReddIt Previous articleSizzling Hot! Auction Lots Announced for 2018 Winesong, Mendocino’s Premier Food & Wine EventNext article2018 Winegrape Harvest Begins Today in Sonoma County Press Release Home Industry News Releases Raise a Glass: Meet the Sommeliers at Waldorf Astoria Beverly HillsIndustry News ReleasesWine BusinessRaise a Glass: Meet the Sommeliers at Waldorf Astoria Beverly HillsBy Press Release – August 15, 2018 264 0 Share Facebook TAGSConsumerHiltonWaldorf Astoria Hotels & Resorts Twitterlast_img read more

Community Colleges Meet

first_imgCommunity Colleges Meet EducationJanuary 6, 2012 RelatedCommunity Colleges Meet FacebookTwitterWhatsAppEmail President and Chief Executive Officer of the American Association of Community Colleges (AACC), Dr. Walter Bumphus, has congratulated the Council of Community Colleges of Jamaica (CCCJ) on its contributions over ten years in shaping young minds for future leadership. “I couldn’t help but being nothing short of amazed by the wonderful progress and the achievements you all have had in your ten years as a Council. I note the progress you have made on a number of initiatives, and I really salute you on this conference and the theme chosen,” Dr. Bumphus said. He was addressing participants at the official opening of the conference on Wednesday (January 4), at the Holiday Inn Sunspree Resort, Montego Bay. Activities were carried out during the three days of the conference, (January 4 to 6), under the theme, “New realities, new challenges: a call for bold action”. Dr. Bumphus indicated that he believed in the over 100-year history of community colleges, and emphasized that the whole notion of access has been in the DNA of these institutions. Speaking about the American system of community colleges, Dr. Bumphus noted that these colleges were the backbone of getting the diversity of America to become an educated workforce, a focus that they take much pride in. “We have approximately 1,167 community colleges spread across the 50 states in America. In fact, there is a community college in every Congressional District, because we have a great deal of influence on diverse political issues. In my opinion, the agility of Community Colleges, and our ability to respond, makes us the unique institution that we are,” he reported. Dr. Bumphus observed that there was much focus, visibility and recognition of community colleges in the US, as President Barack Obama and his administration have made them the centrepiece of most of their legislation. He expressed the hope that the Jamaican Council will examine the system in America, and seek to adopt aspects of the programme which may suit the Jamaican initiative. RelatedCommunity Colleges Meetcenter_img RelatedCommunity Colleges Meet Advertisementslast_img read more

Garrigus clings to one-shot lead at Valspar Championship

first_imgPALM HARBOR, Fla. – Robert Garrigus missed two short putts on the back nine and had to settle for a 1-under 70 and a one-shot lead Saturday in the Valspar Championship. Garrigus, who needs a win to get into the Masters next month, opened with back-to-back birdies on the Copperhead course at Innisbrook and stretched his lead to four shots with a nifty flop shot off the pine straw to set up a birdie on the par-5 fifth. He still had a four-shot lead when he missed a 4-foot par putt on the 12th hole, but his lead was down to a single shot when he missed a 3-foot par putt on the final hole. Kevin Na chipped in for birdie on the 15th and shot a 68. Garrigus was at 8-under 205. ”I had fun,” Garrigus said. ”I’m in a good position. If I play a good round tomorrow, if I shoot under par, they’re going to have to come get me.” The final group was put on the clock on the back nine, and Na received a bad time on the 13th tee. Na was so deliberate that the final group at times was two holes behind along the back nine, though they finished in just under four hours. Valspar Championship leaderboard Valspar Championship: Articles, videos and photos Garrigus paid the price, too. He was given a bad time for the first time in his career, shocking because he is among the fastest players on Tour. In this case, he had a tough lie in the rough on the 14th hole and walked up to the green to gauge his options. That led to the bad time, and Garrigus said he didn’t bother looking at his next shot as long as he normally would have. It was a long putt that ran some 15 feet by the hole, but he made that for par. ”Best putt of the week,” he said. Garrigus and Na will be in the final group again Sunday, with plenty of company right behind them on the leaderboard. Na was defensive about the pace, and his reputation. ”I know how to play,” he said. ”I don’t know what people have said, but I don’t think I should be criticized.” Asked how much he has improved since his slow play was on display at The Players Championship in 2012, when he couldn’t take a swing or sometimes purposely swung over the ball so he could start over, Na said, ”A ton.” ”It’s not fair to me,” he said. ”I already have that stamp on me.” John Senden matched the low score of the tournament with a 64 in perfect, sunny weather. He moved up 32 spots to third, and goes into the final round only two shots behind. Justin Rose hit a wild tee shot on the 18th and made bogey, though his 69 left the No. 7 player in the world in reasonable shape. He was three behind. Retief Goosen made the cut on the number, and then played bogey-free for a 64. He was finished with his round some two hours before the final group even teed off. When the day ended, Goosen was four shots behind in a tie for fifth, along with Charley Hoffman (67) and Scott Langley (69). Luke Donald had a 67, and those two bogeys by Garrigus gave the former world No. 1 some hope. ”I’ve played here enough times, and seeing the scores over the last couple days, I knew a good round would shoot me up the board,” said Donald, who won at Innisbrook in 2012. ”So just try to play my own game and post something low-ish to get me back into contention.” Pat Perez wasn’t as fortunate. He opened with a birdie, but then pulled his tee shot into the vegetation left of the third fairway. A penalty drop would have left the ball just in front of a palmetto bush, so he went back to the tee and made double bogey. He made another double bogey on the back nine with a tee shot into the water on No. 12 and fell out of tournament with a 77. Na is notorious for fidgeting over his tee shots, and even with the Perez penalty on No. 3, the final group fell far behind and stayed that way. ”They took off,” Garrigus said. ”When Pat is playing bad, he takes four seconds to hit a shot.” Seven players were separated by four shots –the size of the lead Garrigus had with seven holes remaining in the third round – and only one of them (Rose) already has a tee time booked for Augusta National next month. Goosen has plenty at stake even if he doesn’t go from the cut line to a win. He has three more tournaments after this to make about $104,000 to retain his card from a major medical extension because of his back surgery. DIVOTS: The 54-hole cut was at 5-over-par, and 76 players advanced to Sunday. Among those who missed was Luke Guthrie, who started the third round at 2-under and shot an 80. Ricky Barnes shot 42 on the back nine for a 77 to miss by one shot. … Mark Calcavecchia made a tough up-and-down for par on the last hole that at the time was good enough to make the cut on the number. ”Yay. I think,” said his wife, Brenda, who caddies for him.last_img read more